Problems with "New" Bible Versions - Part 1

I (Rich) started this back in November 2008 - I plan to add to it in the near future:

Problems with the “New” Bible Versions:
(Any versions other than the KJV)

1. The “new” bible versions use scriptures that were perverted in Alexandria, Egypt instead of the preserved scriptures found in Antioch of Syria (where the disciples were first called “Christians”).

2. The “scholars” of Alexandria couldn’t agree on anything regarding the bible. The main source of the resulting false bible was Origen:
Origen was not a bible-believer
Origen did not believe in the Old Testament miracles
Origen did not believe many of Jesus’ words or stories
Origen did not believe the Holy Spirit was eternal
Origen did not believe that Jesus Christ is Almighty God
Therefore, Origen freely removed Jesus’ words and changed verses as he saw fit. He made up his own version of the bible. It contained his own modified Greek Old Testament, mixed in the “old folk tales” called the Apocrypha, and added his own perverted New Testament.

3. Origen called his modified Old Testament mixed with the Aprocrypha: the “ancient” Septuagint.

4. The combined Septuagint and Origen’s perverted New Testament are called the Alexandrian Bible.

5. Origen is today considered a “saint” even though he wasn’t a real Christian!

6. The “scholars” at Alexandria wrote 3 bible perversions:
Sinaiticus (about 350 AD)
Vaticanus (before 400 AD)
Alexandrinus (about 450 AD)

7. The Vaudois from northwest Italy (east of France) went to Antioch of Syria to receive God’s words in about 120 AD. For the next 37 years they translated the bible into Latin. This true bible was known as the Old Latin Bible. This bible was also known as the Common Bible or the Vulgate Bible. (This “vulgate” is not to be confused with Jerome’s false “vulgate” published later).

8. Rome’s last Caesar, Constantine, gave himself a new title: Pontifex Maximus (a.k.a. Pope).

TO BE CONTINUED...